You can choose the worst spam, and if it is linked from ome page

niyadiw130

The items will be meaty. The explanation that content marketing and UX do the job is inappropriate. They do not do. Despite 200 different algorithmic factors, optimization and links, with an emphasis on the latter, are responsible for 90% of a website's success in organics. You don't have to invest in links I also read in the entry: You do not have to carry out activities involving purchasing content or creating an automated back-end configured in such a way as to provide as many links to the website as possible  What is more important is systematic work and what is this article about? background.

Its definition is archaic, but over the years the form of preparation has changed. In the past, the backend was a pyramid of links created for the website. Today it may be the content on your Phone Number List website. And today, a pyramid of links cannot be a backup anymore? If agency A has a budget of PLN 1,000 net per month and understands that this is what the client came for, then TOP 1 in organic results will achieve incomparably better positions than agency B, which pasted sexy infographics and buys sponsored articles for PLN 500 net with a brand link sewn in and it's nofollow. Well, it's black hat SEO.




Przemysław explains that it is content marketing, and not your own conventional SEO background, that gives long-term results. It mentions well-written texts and a useful website in terms of UX (sic! - this is indeed an important ranking factor). I wonder if we are still talking about the Google algorithm or what the user expects from our website? Because it is not the same after all. SEO sells everything but SEO Przemysław Śmit's entry is just a taste of what has been happening in the industry recently. SEO is clearly falling apart and it's not about sticking to creating more copies of WP-Kats, but there are too many services that have nothing to do with reality .